Home

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 October 2010.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 October 2010.

Data

Court
General Court
Case date
21 oktober 2010

Uitspraak





Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 October 2010 – Agapiou Joséphidès v Commission and EACEA

(Case T-439/08)

Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the award of a Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence to the University of Cyprus – Documents emanating from a third party – Partial refusal of access – Action for annulment – Time-limit for action – Inadmissibility – Objection of illegality – Exception relating to the protection of the privacy and integrity of the individual – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests – Duty to give reasons

1.                     Actions for annulment – Conditions for admissibility – Action brought against the author of the contested measure – Exceptions – Measures adopted under delegated powers imputable to the delegating institution – Conditions (Art. 230 EC) (see paras 34-38)

2.                     Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Concept – Decision of the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) partially rejecting an application for access to documents under Regulation No 1049/2001 – Decision-making competence of EACEA distinct from that of the Commission – Inclusion in the concept (Art. 230 EC) (see paras 42-45)

3.                     Plea of illegality – Scope – Measures the illegality of which may be pleaded – General measure providing the basis of the contested decision – Need for a legal connection between the contested measure and the contested general measure (Arts 230 EC and 241 EC) (see paras 49-51, 53-54)

4.                     European Communities – Community institutions and bodies – Right of public access to documents –Article 255 EC and Article 1, second indent, EU – Direct effect – None – Effect (Art. 255 EC; Art. 1, second para., EU) (see paras 62-63)

5.                     Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Concept – Measures producing binding legal effects – Decision of the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) partially to refuse access to Commission documents following a fresh application – Assessment as to whether that decision definitive or otherwise – Obligation to bring a fresh confirmatory application for access – None (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Arts 4(1), (3) and (7), 6(1), 7 and 8(1)) (see paras 73-75, 78)

6.                     European Communities – Community institutions and bodies – Right of public access to documents – Obligation of institutions or bodies to develop sound administrative practices (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Art. 15(1)) (see paras 88-90)

7.                     European Communities – Community institutions and bodies – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Documents originating from third parties – Prior consultation of third parties concerned – Scope – Mandatory nature – None – Discretion of the institutions (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Art. 4(4)) (see para. 95)

8.                     European Communities – Community institutions and bodies – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Conditions – Restrictive interpretation – Principle of proportionality – Obligation on the institution or body to make a concrete and individual examination of documents – Possibility of granting partial access to documents (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Arts 4(2), (3) and (6)) (see paras 105-108)

9.                     European Communities – Community institutions and bodies – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – Obligation on the institution or body to make a concrete and individual examination of documents – Scope – Possibility of granting partial access to documents (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Arts 4(1)(b) and (6)) (see paras 111-112, 114-120)

10.                     European Communities – Community institutions and bodies – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Protection of the commercial interests of a legal person – Obligation on the institution or body to make a concrete and individual examination of documents – Possibility of granting partial access to documents (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Art. 4(2), first indent) (see paras 125-127, 129)

11.                     European Communities – Community institutions and bodies – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Overriding public interest justifying the disclosure of documents – Concept – Obligation on the institution or body to balance the interests at stake (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Arts 4(2) and (3)) (see paras 136-137, 139-142)

12.                     Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope (Art. 253 EC; European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Arts 4(1)(b), (2) and (3)) (see paras 146-150)

13.                     Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Point from which time starts to run – Measure not published and not notified to the applicant – Precise knowledge of the content and reasons – Duty to request the whole text of the decision within a reasonable time once its existence is known – Request formulated more than four months after existence of the contested decision became known – Unreasonable delay – Inadmissibility of the application (Art. 230, fifth para., EC) (see paras 157-161)

14.                     Procedure – Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings – Head of claim first raised at the reply stage – Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 48(2)) (see paras 168-169)

Re:

ANNULMENT, firstly, of the decision of the EACEA of 1 August 2008, concerning a request for access to certain documents relating to the award of a Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence to the University of Cyprus and, secondly, of Commission Decision C(2007) 3749 of 8 August 2007 relating to an individual decision to award a subsidy within the framework of the Lifelong Learning Programme, Jean Monnet sub-programme.

Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Ms Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès to pay the costs.