Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2015
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2015
Data
- Court
- Court of Justice
- Case date
- 4 juni 2015
Verdict
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 —
Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító v Commission and Ombudsman
(Case C‑576/14 P) 1 (1)
"Appeal - Action for annulment - Refusal by the Commission to bring infringement proceedings - Inadmissibility and lack of jurisdiction of the General Court - Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible"
1. Actions for annulmentJurisdiction of the Courts of the European UnionClaim seeking that directions be issued to an institutionInadmissibility (Art. 263 TFEU) (see para. 15)
2. Actions for annulmentActionable measuresRefusal of the Commission to bring infringement proceedingsNot includedNo infringement of the right to effective judicial protection (Arts 258 TFEU and 263 TFEU; Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union, Art. 47) (see paras 16, 23)
3. AppealsGroundsSpecific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning necessaryObscure groundInadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paras 19, 20)
4. AppealsGroundsMere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General CourtError of law relied on not identifiedInadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d)) (see para. 24)
Operative part
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító kft is ordered to pay the costs.