Order of the Court of 7 October 2019

Data

Court: Court of Justice

Case date: 7 oktober 2019

Verdict

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 7 October 2019 — L’Oréal v EUIPO

(Case C‑589/19 P)

"(Appeal - EU trade mark - Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed - Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law - Appeal not allowed to proceed)"

1. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedSignificant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawInadequate or contradictory groundsRequest that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to show the significance of the issueAppeal not allowed to proceed

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)

(see paras 10-12)

2. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedSignificant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawRequest that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to show the significance of the issueAppeal not allowed to proceed

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)

(see paras 13, 14, 18)

3. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedSignificant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawIncompatibility with the Court’s case-lawRequest that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to show the significance of the issueAppeal not allowed to proceed

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)

(see paras 15-17)

Operative part

1. The appeal is not allowed to proceed.

2. L’Oréal shall bear its own costs.