Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 May 2021
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 May 2021
Data
- Court
- Court of Justice
- Case date
- 5 mei 2021
Verdict
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 May 2021 – Production Christian Gallimard v EUIPO
(Case C‑143/21 P)
"(Appeal - EU trade mark - Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed - Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law - Appeal not allowed to proceed)"
AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedIssue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawBurden of proof
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170b)
(see para. 11)
AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedRequest that an appeal be allowed to proceedFormal requirementsScope
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a(1) and 170b)
(see paras 12-14)
AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedIssue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawRequest that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that the issue is significantAppeal not allowed to proceed
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a(1) and 170b)
(see paras 15-18)
Operative part
The appeal is not allowed to proceed.
Production Christian Gallimard shall bear its own costs.