Home

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021

Data

Court
Court of Justice
Case date
13 december 2021

Verdict

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 – SESCAM

(Case C‑151/21)

"(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Principle of non-discrimination - Field of public health - Calculation of length-of-service increments - National legislation refusing to take into account, as regards permanent staff regulated under administrative law, for the purpose of calculating length-of-service increments, periods corresponding to activities temporarily exercised in a higher professional category)"

1. Social policyFramework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEPDirective 1999/70Conditions of employmentConceptThree-yearly length-of-service incrementsIncluded

(Council Directive 1999/70, Annex, Clause 4(1))

(see para. 28)

2. Social policyFramework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEPDirective 1999/70ScopePermanent member of staff of the public health serviceNot includedTemporary exercise by that member of staff of activities in a higher professional categoryNational legislation denying him or her the right to the three-yearly length-of-service increments corresponding to that categoryRight otherwise granted to fixed-term workersWhether permissible

(Council Directive 1999/70, Annex, Clause 4)

(see paras 29-32)

Operative part

Clause 4 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is set out in the annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which provides that, for a permanent worker who temporarily performs duties in a professional category that is higher than the one to which he or she belongs, the three-yearly length-of-service increments to which he or she is entitled are those corresponding to that latter category, even though, for a fixed-term worker placed in the same situation, the three-yearly length-of-service increments correspond to those of the professional category in which his or her duties were actually performed.