Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022
Data
- Court
- Court of Justice
- Case date
- 5 april 2022
Verdict
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022 – Kappes v Sedus Stoll and EUIPO
(Case C‑784/21 P)
"(Appeal - EU trade mark - Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed - Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law - Appeal not allowed to proceed)"
1. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedIssue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawBurden of proof
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a(1) and 170b)
(see para. 14)
2. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedRequest that an appeal be allowed to proceedFormal requirementsScope
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a(1) and 170b)
(see paras 15-17)
3. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedIssue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawIncompatibility with the case-law of the CourtRequest that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that the issue is significantAppeal not allowed to proceed
(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a (1) and 170b)
(see paras 18, 19)
Operative part
1. The appeal is not allowed to proceed.
2. Mr Wolfgang Kappes shall bear his own costs.